Mountbatten investments pty ltd v mahomed
Nettet20. mar. 2007 · The agreement was entered into between the first appellant (Propfokus 49 (Pty) (Ltd)) and the respondent (Wenhandel 4 (Pty) (Ltd)) on 5 July 2004. The second and third appellants are the only two shareholders in Propfokus. Nettet1. jan. 2005 · Investments (Pty) Ltd v Mahomed 1989 (1) SA 172 (D) it was held that, if no part of the consideration for the delivery of a res is in cash, the contract cannot be classified as one of purchase ...
Mountbatten investments pty ltd v mahomed
Did you know?
NettetHaviside v Heydricks and Another 2014 (1) SA 235 (KZP). Mountbatten Investments (Pty) Ltd v Mahomed 1989 (1) SA 172 (D). Johnston v Leal 1980 (3) SA 927 (A). Odendaal v Ferraris 2009 (4) SA 313 (SCA). Patel v Adam 1977 (2) SA 653 (A). Plit v Imperial Bank Ltd 2007 (1) SA 315 (SCA). NettetQuestion: Commercial Law - In the case of Gengan v Pathur 1977 (1) SA 826, Gengan bought some buildings from Pathur. The contract (deed of sale) stated that in respect of the property would pass to the buyer Gengan (the …
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2007/15.html Nettetpaid partly in cash and partly by the trade-in by the purchaser of another motor vehicle: see Antonie v The Price Controller & Another 1946 TPD 190; Massyn’s Motors v Van Rooyen 1965 (3) SA 717 (O); Wastie v Security Motors (Pty) Ltd 1972 (2) SA 129 (C); Mountbatten Investments (Pty) Ltd v Mahomed 1989 (1) SA 172 (D).
NettetLendalease Finance (Pty) Ltd v Corporacion De Mercadeo Agricola and Others 1976 (4) SA 464 (A) Facts: • Respondent (CMA), a Venezuelan 'institute', had purchased 130 000 tons of maize from the Maize Board • Ito the written contract between CMA and the Maize Board, the maize was to be shipped FOB in 10 separate cargoes between March and … Nettet• Mountbatten Investments (Pty) Ltd v Mohamed 1989 (1) SA 172 (D) – Test: which is of greater value – goods or money. If same, presumption of sale. 6 Passing of ownership • Only the owner of a merx may transfer …
NettetMountbatten Investments v Mahomed: Facts: M (Pty) Ltd sold a 1986 model BMW to M for R58 535 M paid by means of R14 535 cash and the balance by trade in of another vehicle also a BMW Through an innocent misrepresentation, M represented to Mount that the trade-in vehicle was a 1985 model, but it was in fact a 1983 model. qtips in paper boxNettetCase List: Chapter 13: Mountbatten Investments ltd v Mahomed-M sold car to M-M paid the purchase price in means of cash and the balance of the price by way of trade-in of another vehicle (same type of car)-Through innocent misrepresentation, M represented to M (pty LTD) that the trade in vehicle was a 1985 model when it was actually 1983 … qtip work it outNettet1. jan. 2005 · Investments (Pty) Ltd v Mahomed 1989 (1) SA 172 (D) it was held that, if no part of the consideration for the delivery of a res is in cash, the contract cannot be classified as one of purchase ... qtitetherserviceNettet[ 43 ] Meridian Bay Restaurant (Pty) Ltd v Mitchell 2011 4 SA 1 (SCA) Confirms that a real right prevails over personal rights unless prior actual knowledge is present. Also confirms first in time = first in right. THEME 6 [38] Lammers and Lammers v Giovannoni 1955 3 SA 385 (A) – partial eviction case. qtips bathroomNettetThe nature of trade-in agreements : Mountbatten Investments (Pty) Ltd v Mahomed 1989 (1) SA 172 (D) Authors : Hawthorne, L. Journal Title : Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg. Citation : (1990) 53 THRHR 116. S.A. Cases Cited : Mountbatten Investments (Pty) Ltd v Mahomed 1989 (1) SA 172 (D): qtips lowest priceNettetThe course is designed so that students successfully completing this course should be able to achieve the following outcomes: To understand and explain the essential elements of a valid contract of sale, lease and carriage. To understand and explain some of the key legal consequences of entering into a contract of sale, lease and carriage. To … qtips family dollarhttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2014/182.pdf qtitelephony